Hello,Please find the cip-0043 open for discussion at the PR https://github.com/global-synchronizer-foundation/cips/pull/14In order to move to a vote we are requesting a Super Validator to sponsor the CIP and a second Super Validator to endorse the CIP.Any SV sponsors/endorses or changes needed?Dr. Amanda L. Martin
814-359-6544Director of Program Management
this draft doesn't look right - seems to confuse TRM with Coin Metrics ?On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 1:01 PM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:Hello,Please find the cip-0043 open for discussion at the PR https://github.com/global-synchronizer-foundation/cips/pull/14In order to move to a vote we are requesting a Super Validator to sponsor the CIP and a second Super Validator to endorse the CIP.Any SV sponsors/endorses or changes needed?Dr. Amanda L. Martin
814-359-6544Director of Program Management--
This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to important terms and conditions available at http://www.digitalasset.com/emaildisclaimer.html. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message.
Thanks Eric,The header has been updated. The easiest way to view the file is via this linkDr. Amanda L. Martin
814-359-6544Director of Program ManagementOn Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 1:10 PM Eric Saraniecki via lists.sync.global <eric=digitalasset.com@...> wrote:this draft doesn't look right - seems to confuse TRM with Coin Metrics ?On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 1:01 PM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:Hello,Please find the cip-0043 open for discussion at the PR https://github.com/global-synchronizer-foundation/cips/pull/14In order to move to a vote we are requesting a Super Validator to sponsor the CIP and a second Super Validator to endorse the CIP.Any SV sponsors/endorses or changes needed?Dr. Amanda L. Martin
814-359-6544Director of Program Management--
This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to important terms and conditions available at http://www.digitalasset.com/emaildisclaimer.html. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message.
Hi! When we discussed last week we agreed to try and negotiate the weight down a bit from 2.5.
Has such conversations happened? Or do I mix them up?
If this is the best and final, I am supportive. If we are still negotiating, then I suggest we wait for the final weight.
Veronica
|
Thanks - happy to sponsor CIP 0043 if there is a second
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 1:13 PM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:
Thanks Eric,
The header has been updated. The easiest way to view the file is via this link
Dr. Amanda L. Martin
814-359-6544Director of Program Management
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 1:10 PM Eric Saraniecki via lists.sync.global <eric=digitalasset.com@...> wrote:
this draft doesn't look right - seems to confuse TRM with Coin Metrics ?
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 1:01 PM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:
Hello,
Please find the cip-0043 open for discussion at the PR https://github.com/global-synchronizer-foundation/cips/pull/14
In order to move to a vote we are requesting a Super Validator to sponsor the CIP and a second Super Validator to endorse the CIP.
Any SV sponsors/endorses or changes needed?
Dr. Amanda L. Martin
814-359-6544Director of Program Management
--
This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to important terms and conditions available at http://www.digitalasset.com/emaildisclaimer.html. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message.
--
This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to
important terms and conditions available at http://www.digitalasset.com/emaildisclaimer.html.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message.
Hi! When we discussed last week we agreed to try and negotiate the weight down a bit from 2.5.
Has such conversations happened? Or do I mix them up?
If this is the best and final, I am supportive. If we are still negotiating, then I suggest we wait for the final weight.
Veronica
|
From: cip-discuss@... <cip-discuss@...>
On Behalf Of Eric Saraniecki via lists.sync.global
Sent: Thursday, 6 February 2025 19:15
To: cip-discuss@...
Subject: Re: [cip-discuss] CIP-0043: Add TRM as a SV
Thanks - happy to sponsor CIP 0043 if there is a second
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 1:13 PM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:
Thanks Eric,
The header has been updated. The easiest way to view the file is via this link
Dr. Amanda L. Martin
814-359-6544Director of Program Management
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 1:10 PM Eric Saraniecki via lists.sync.global <eric=digitalasset.com@...> wrote:
this draft doesn't look right - seems to confuse TRM with Coin Metrics ?
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 1:01 PM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:
Hello,
Please find the cip-0043 open for discussion at the PR https://github.com/global-synchronizer-foundation/cips/pull/14
In order to move to a vote we are requesting a Super Validator to sponsor the CIP and a second Super Validator to endorse the CIP.
Any SV sponsors/endorses or changes needed?
Dr. Amanda L. Martin
814-359-6544Director of Program Management
--
This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to important terms and conditions available at http://www.digitalasset.com/emaildisclaimer.html. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message.
--
This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to
important terms and conditions available at http://www.digitalasset.com/emaildisclaimer.html.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message.
Thank you Eric.
Then I am in favour too.
We countered at 2, TRM was at 3, they countered at 2.5
I'm presenting their counter
On Feb 7, 2025, at 9:51 AM, Veronica Augustsson via lists.sync.global <veronica=7ridge.com@...> wrote:
Hi! When we discussed last week we agreed to try and negotiate the weight down a bit from 2.5.
Has such conversations happened? Or do I mix them up?
If this is the best and final, I am supportive. If we are still negotiating, then I suggest we wait for the final weight.
Veronica
|
From:
cip-discuss@... <cip-discuss@...>
On Behalf Of Eric Saraniecki via lists.sync.global
Sent: Thursday, 6 February 2025 19:15
To: cip-discuss@...
Subject: Re: [cip-discuss] CIP-0043: Add TRM as a SV
Thanks - happy to sponsor CIP 0043 if there is a second
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 1:13 PM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:
Thanks Eric,
The header has been updated. The easiest way to view the file is via this link
Dr. Amanda L. Martin
814-359-6544Director of Program Management
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 1:10 PM Eric Saraniecki via lists.sync.global <eric=digitalasset.com@...> wrote:
this draft doesn't look right - seems to confuse TRM with Coin Metrics ?
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 1:01 PM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:
Hello,
Please find the cip-0043 open for discussion at the PR https://github.com/global-synchronizer-foundation/cips/pull/14
In order to move to a vote we are requesting a Super Validator to sponsor the CIP and a second Super Validator to endorse the CIP.
Any SV sponsors/endorses or changes needed?
Dr. Amanda L. Martin
814-359-6544Director of Program Management
--
This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to important terms and conditions available at http://www.digitalasset.com/emaildisclaimer.html. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message.
--
This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to
important terms and conditions available at http://www.digitalasset.com/emaildisclaimer.html.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message.
This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to
important terms and conditions available at http://www.digitalasset.com/emaildisclaimer.html.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message.
Question for the team, if TRM doesn’t supply all 3 apps, does their weighting drop accordingly?
Jan
We countered at 2, TRM was at 3, they countered at 2.5
I'm presenting their counter
On Feb 7, 2025, at 9:51 AM, Veronica Augustsson via lists.sync.global <veronica=7ridge.com@...> wrote:
Hi! When we discussed last week we agreed to try and negotiate the weight down a bit from 2.5.
Has such conversations happened? Or do I mix them up?
If this is the best and final, I am supportive. If we are still negotiating, then I suggest we wait for the final weight.
Veronica
|
From:
cip-discuss@... <cip-discuss@...>
On Behalf Of Eric Saraniecki via lists.sync.global
Sent: Thursday, 6 February 2025 19:15
To: cip-discuss@...
Subject: Re: [cip-discuss] CIP-0043: Add TRM as a SV
Thanks - happy to sponsor CIP 0043 if there is a second
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 1:13 PM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:
Thanks Eric,
The header has been updated. The easiest way to view the file is via this link
Dr. Amanda L. Martin
814-359-6544Director of Program Management
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 1:10 PM Eric Saraniecki via lists.sync.global <eric=digitalasset.com@...> wrote:
this draft doesn't look right - seems to confuse TRM with Coin Metrics ?
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 1:01 PM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:
Hello,
Please find the cip-0043 open for discussion at the PR https://github.com/global-synchronizer-foundation/cips/pull/14
In order to move to a vote we are requesting a Super Validator to sponsor the CIP and a second Super Validator to endorse the CIP.
Any SV sponsors/endorses or changes needed?
Dr. Amanda L. Martin
814-359-6544Director of Program Management
--
This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to important terms and conditions available at http://www.digitalasset.com/emaildisclaimer.html. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message.
--
This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to
important terms and conditions available at http://www.digitalasset.com/emaildisclaimer.html.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message.
This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to
important terms and conditions available at http://www.digitalasset.com/emaildisclaimer.html.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message.
Good question, I’d like to better understand this as well as 2.5 weight all in is a stretch for me.
My read is there is a few deliverables, some easily measurable and some less so:
Given they pushed to negotiate higher due to the multi-faceted effort, I think there is merit to proportional weight drops if they fail to meet their commitment in some capacity.
For the sake of argument maybe something like the below assuming 2.5? Feel free to suggest something else, these numbers are just to start the conversation.
1) 1.0
2) 1.0
3) 0.25 (not sure how to measure this KPI in an objective way)
4) 0.25
Thanks
Chris
Question for the team, if TRM doesn’t supply all 3 apps, does their weighting drop accordingly? Jan From: cip-discuss@ lists. sync. global <cip-discuss@ lists. sync. global> on behalf of Veronica Augustsson via lists. sync. global <veronica=7ridge. com@ lists. sync. global>
Question for the team, if TRM doesn’t supply all 3 apps, does their weighting drop accordingly?
Jan
Hi Chris,
I like your idea
Jan
Question for the team, if TRM doesn’t supply all 3 apps, does their weighting drop accordingly? Jan From: cip-discuss@ lists. sync. global <cip-discuss@ lists. sync. global> on behalf of Veronica Augustsson via lists. sync. global <veronica=7ridge. com@ lists. sync. global>
Question for the team, if TRM doesn’t supply all 3 apps, does their weighting drop accordingly?
Jan
This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and proprietary and otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, do not read, duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please immediately delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it by mistake. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail or any attachments. The DRW Companies make no representations that this e-mail or any attachments are free of computer viruses or other defects.
This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and proprietary and otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, do not read, duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please immediately delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it by mistake. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail or any attachments. The DRW Companies make no representations that this e-mail or any attachments are free of computer viruses or other defects.Good question, I’d like to better understand this as well as 2.5 weight all in is a stretch for me.
My read is there is a few deliverables, some easily measurable and some less so:
- CC integrated with their on-chain AML product within 6 months.
- USDC integrated with their on-chain AML product within 6 months.
- Active regulatory and educational engagement.
- Join as a GM of GSF
Given they pushed to negotiate higher due to the multi-faceted effort, I think there is merit to proportional weight drops if they fail to meet their commitment in some capacity. For the sake of argument maybe something like the below assuming 2.5? Feel free to suggest something else, these numbers are just to start the conversation.
1) 1.02) 1.0
3) 0.25 (not sure how to measure this KPI in an objective way)
4) 0.25
Thanks
Chris
From: cip-discuss@... <cip-discuss@...> On Behalf Of Jan Hoenisch via lists.sync.global
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2025 9:38 AM
To: cip-discuss@...
Subject: [ext] Re: [cip-discuss] CIP-0043: Add TRM as a SV
Question for the team, if TRM doesn’t supply all 3 apps, does their weighting drop accordingly? Jan From: cip-discuss@ lists. sync. global <cip-discuss@ lists. sync. global> on behalf of Veronica Augustsson via lists. sync. global <veronica=7ridge. com@ lists. sync. global>
Question for the team, if TRM doesn’t supply all 3 apps, does their weighting drop accordingly?
Jan
