CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning

Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
 
Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
 
Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
5North - SV Endorser

All other operators vote please list:
<SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>

All –

 

I was hopeful that we would get a chance to discuss this during our call tomorrow before it moved to vote. I think this is an important topic with nuance to consider as well as a potential alternative/additive element to consider—introducing a similar mechanism to enable updating the FA reward multiplier or cap.  The approach would, I believe, have a similar effect as the current proposal but perhaps be more intuitive.  

 

Its entirely possible that the correct approach is enabling both—one to address changes in the infrastructure costs of the increasing utility provided by the network and one to account for changing elastic/in-elastic demand dynamics for the network’s applications.

 

I would like to discuss this topic during tomorrow’s call before casting Cumberland DRWs vote.  Everyone is obviously free to proceed as they wish, but I think it would helpful to most if we could discuss, and consider alternatives, before the vote completes.

 

Thanks

Chris

 

From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> On Behalf Of Chris Matturri
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2025 8:45 AM
To: cip-vote@...
Subject: [ext] Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning

 

Proof group votes yes Chris Matturri ​​​​ chris@ proofgroup. xyz ProofGroup. xyz On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8: 59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists. sync. global <amartin=linuxfoundation. org@ lists. sync. global> wrote: Hello Super Validator Node Owners,

Proof group votes yes 

Chris Matturri ​​​​ chris@... ProofGroup.xyz

 

 

On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8:59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:

Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
 
Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
 
Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
5North - SV Endorser

All other operators vote please list:
<SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>

 

This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and proprietary and otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, do not read, duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please immediately delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it by mistake. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail or any attachments. The DRW Companies make no representations that this e-mail or any attachments are free of computer viruses or other defects.

We would like to temporarily recall our vote until we have a chance to chat with Chris Z & team to hear their alternative proposal to this 

On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 12:01 PM Chris Zuehlke via lists.sync.global <czuehlke=drwholdings.com@...> wrote:

All –

 

I was hopeful that we would get a chance to discuss this during our call tomorrow before it moved to vote. I think this is an important topic with nuance to consider as well as a potential alternative/additive element to consider—introducing a similar mechanism to enable updating the FA reward multiplier or cap.  The approach would, I believe, have a similar effect as the current proposal but perhaps be more intuitive.  

 

Its entirely possible that the correct approach is enabling both—one to address changes in the infrastructure costs of the increasing utility provided by the network and one to account for changing elastic/in-elastic demand dynamics for the network’s applications.

 

I would like to discuss this topic during tomorrow’s call before casting Cumberland DRWs vote.  Everyone is obviously free to proceed as they wish, but I think it would helpful to most if we could discuss, and consider alternatives, before the vote completes.

 

Thanks

Chris

 

From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> On Behalf Of Chris Matturri
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2025 8:45 AM
To: cip-vote@...
Subject: [ext] Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning

 

Proof group votes yes Chris Matturri ​​​​ chris@ proofgroup. xyz ProofGroup. xyz On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8: 59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists. sync. global <amartin=linuxfoundation. org@ lists. sync. global> wrote: Hello Super Validator Node Owners,

Proof group votes yes 

Chris Matturri ​​​​ chris@... ProofGroup.xyz

 

 

On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8:59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:

Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
 
Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
 
Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
5North - SV Endorser

All other operators vote please list:
<SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>

 

This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and proprietary and otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, do not read, duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please immediately delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it by mistake. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail or any attachments. The DRW Companies make no representations that this e-mail or any attachments are free of computer viruses or other defects.

Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
 
Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
 
Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
5North - SV Endorser

All other operators vote please list:
<SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>